What Makes a Good Young Picture Book?

Remember what it’s like to see spring for the first time? To get your first grown-up bed? To run in the park, on the beach, along the Brooklyn Promenade, and never want to slow down? To find sneezes hilarious and wrapping paper the best toy in the world?

To write a good young picture book, you not only have to remember these things, you have to relive them. You have to write with all the skill of an adult who understands words, rhythm, rhyme, character, and story and all the heart and soul of a child who understands joy, anger, sorrow, and wonder in their purest form. It’s the wedding of our present and past selves that allows us to write a good young picture book. Then the illustrator completes the picture in every sense of the word.

Marilyn Singer, BooHoo Boo-Boo. Ill. by Elivia Savadier. HarperCollins, 2002. Didi and Daddy on the Promenade. Ill. by Marie-Louise Gay. Clarion, 2001.


A fabulous young picture book should be the perfect combination of simple, yet fetching art, and lively, memorable text. A young picture book must be MEANT to be read aloud–full of delicious words and phrases that will roll off the tongue and beg to be repeated by the young listener. Repetition, alliteration, rhyme, and animal sounds might all contribute. Best of all, if the book speaks, in some way, to the littlest reader’s experience, it will be a favorite!

Toni Buzzeo. Little Loon and Papa. Dial, 2004. Dawdle Duckling. Clarion, 2003. Both ill. by Margaret Spengler.


A book for the very young should have words that swing and pictures that grab the eye. There should be enough in it that is familiar, to offer comfort, and enough that is new, to spark interest and create a sense of adventure.

Martha Davis Beck. Editor, Riverbank Review.


I think the most important feature for very young children is familiarity with the subject matter. Newborn to three is generally before kids start widening their world to include anything outside family and home. Familiar objects, people, pets, behaviors. Basic fears: of being lost, of the dark, of loud noises like thunder…

Of course there are exceptions to this, but, by and large, children at this very early age are still incredibly self-absorbed, and entertained easily by exploration of self . Reassurance is important, as in all the “Mommy Loves You” types of books.

At three children are still quite literal, so animals and toys can talk, period, and boys can sail off to where the wild things are.

Barbara Seuling. Robert Takes a Stand. Cricket, 2004. Ill by Paul Brewer. Whose House? Harcourt, 2004. Ill. by Kay Chorao.


It’s often said that a good picture book resonates on two levels–for the child and for the adult reading to the child. What’s not said is just HOW a picture book goes about doing this.

I believe there are issues that surface in childhood that continue throughout our lives, and that when we’re eighty, we’re still negotiating these basic issues:
–separation, loss, and reunion;
–dependence vs. independence;
–insecurity (which includes feelings of jealousy, envy, and rivalry) vs. security;
–delayed vs. instant gratification.

The stories that have the most powerful effects on both child and adult are ones that deal with at least one of these lifelong struggles. Though a child’s experiences are different from a 20-year-old’s, and a 30-year-old’s are different from a 40-year-old’s, the same feelings are at the core.

Harriet Ziefert. You Can’t See Your Bones With Binoculars. Blue Apple, 2003. Rockheads. Houghton, 2004.


What makes a good picture book?

1. Rhythm in both text and art.

2. A tight text rich in language.

3. Use of repetition or refrain which encourages the listeners to
participate.

4. A sense of playfulness and joy.

5. And rhyme, when it works, is a plus.

Denise Fleming. Buster. Holt, 2003. In the Small, Small Pond. Holt, 1993. In the Tall, Tall Grass. Holt, 1991.


A good picture book for the young usually is a book that a child doesn’t tire of, that he/she can repeat favorite words or lines from after a reading or two, that uses repetition and chanting rhythmic lines, language play and silly or even more sophisticated and many-syllabled words. Children love to repeat words like “cobbled” or “crumbled,” “trolley” or “bulldozer.” A good picture book reminds children what they already know, making them feel clever; the cat sips milk, the cow sleeps in a barn, the giant stomps, the mice scurry, etc. A good book for the young allows a child to be brave, be smart, be comforted, be funny. If the bear is brave, he/she is. If the giant is smart, he/she is. More than anything, a good picture book brings them into the music or the magic of the moment.

Rebecca Kai Dotlich. Mama Loves. Ill. by Kathryn Brown. HarperCollins, 2004. Away We Go! Ill. by Dan Yaccarino. HarperCollins, 2000.


A great picture book for young children is performance art between two covers. The text must be read aloud, and the words flow off your tongue smoothly and effortlessly, showing you how to say them. My favorite is So Much by Trish Cooke, illustrated by Helen Oxenbury. It has plenty of great sounds that kids can anticipate, and by the third or fourth page they’re chiming in with “DING DONG! “and “SO MUCH.” Turning pages is an integral part of a picture book experience, and pacing is key. It can be jarring if one page has thirty words and the next, only three. And every word in a picture book has to count for something. There’s that great Mark Twain quote about how the difference between a perfect word and a near-perfect word is the difference between lightning and a lightning bug. Nowhere is this more true than in a picture book.

Kate McMullan. Supercat. Ill. by Pascal Lemaitre. Workman, 2002. I’m Mighty! HarperCollins, 2003. I Stink! HarperCollins, 2002. Both ill. by Jim McMullan.


For me, the two things that make a great picture book for the youngest set are simply lovely, lively pictures and lively, lovely text! Or sometimes just lively… and sometimes just lovely!

Both text and pictures have to appeal to the reader as well as (or more than) to the pre-schooler. This applies especially to books for babies where the adult is doing all the choosing. With older pre-schoolers who have a mind of their own, the subject -something they can relate to – Dogs! Trucks! Cats! Planes! Dinosaurs! Kids! — becomes more important, as does a small plot. But always the colorful pictures and the rhythmic, rollicking, rolling or lulling words are what keep youngsters looking and listening and saying: “Read it again!“– as well as keeping the adult reader from going berserk!

Pat Hubbell. I Like Cats. Ill. by Pamela Paparone. NorthSouth, 2004. Trucks: Whizz! Zoom! Rumble! Ill. by Megan Halsey. Cavendish Children’s Books, 2003..


For me a good picture book is one that works on different levels for both the adult and the child. One that can be read over and over and new things can be heard and seen. I also think reading a picture book is a performance. Good picture books often include sounds and phrases that emphasize this performance aspect.

John Coy. Two Old Potatoes and Me. Ill. by Carolyn Fisher. Knopf, 2003. Vroomaloom Zoom. Ill. by Jon Cepeda. Crown, 2000.


I think that the best books for this audience are the ones that tap directly into a young child’s experience, allowing him or her to enter the world the author and illustrator have created, no matter how unusual or fantastical, and to feel at home there. The storytelling should be straightforward and spare and the art needs to be uncluttered and clearly delineated. Repetition and rhymes sharpen the ears and often invite verbal responses. And who can resist opening a closed flap?

Luann Toth. Senior Book Review Editor, School Library Journal.


Lyrical lines, a recognizable sentiment, compression of story, and a character to love.

Jane Yolen. Off We Go! Ill. by Laurel Molk. Little, Brown, 2000. How Do Dinosaurs Say Goodnight? Ill. by Mark Teague. Blue Sky, 2000. Owl Moon. Ill. by John Schoenherr. Philomel, 1987.


One character/point of view/objective.

Concise language that is both descriptive and good for reading aloud.

Art that enhances the text, not that competes with or obliterates it.

Walter Mayes. Walter The Giant Storyteller’s Giant Book of Giant Stories, coming from Walker Books. Valerie and Walter’s Best Books for Children: A Lively, Opinionated Guide, 2nd Edition (with Valerie Lewis). HarperResource, 2004.


The art and text must go hand in hand, like inseparable lovers.

Lois Ehlert. Pie in the Sky. Harcourt, 2004. Waiting for Wings. Harcourt, 2001. Color Zoo. HarperCollins, 1989.


Limits. Good selection. Elimination. Young, in the question posed, I’d take out.

A lot of what you put in, you should take out. Rewrite it until it’s really simple and terse, and if you can communicate an idea with a picture, eliminate the text.

Limit the span of subject at hand, a lot of things often times are better imagined than imaged.

Limited words, it’s a picture book.

Limited palette, clean and bright and simple. Keep it open at the end; it’s nice to want to want it read, again, and again.

Donald Crews. Sailaway. Greenwillow, 1995. Truck. Greenwillow, 1980. Freight Train. Greenwillow,1979.


In a good picture book,

• the illustrator as well as the author has to be a story teller.
• not even one word can be wasted.
• the text and the art need to dance together.
• the design is integral to the story and illustrations. Type should not just be slapped into a space but should be considered by the artist as part of the art; art and type must work together.
• the book should appeal to the adult reader as well as to the child.

Margery Cuyler. Editorial Director, Cavendish Children’s Books.


My first reaction to the question is that a picture book, in many respects, should be treated no differently than an adult novel, a science-fiction novel, a romance novel, a mystery or even a nonfiction biography. At the center, first and foremost, should be a strong character, a character the reader can relate to and care about throughout the story. If not, the reader will slam the book down and walk away.

Of course, what makes a picture book unique is, obviously, the addition of pictures. But pretty pictures will not and should not carry the whole book. The mistake many author/illustrators (and the editors who publish them) make is thinking a series of beautiful pictures will hide a bad story or weak character. The reader will immediately see through that and once again put the book down. It is only in books where the words and pictures are married perfectly, where each is dependent on the other, that a good picture book works. It’s similar to a singer choosing the right song; can we ever hear anyone singing “Georgia” except Ray Charles? Can we ever listen to”What a Wonderful World” without hearing Louis Armstrong? It’s that perfect match of words and pictures together with a strong central character that will make a picture book memorable and rise above all others.

Doug Cushman. What Moms Can’t Do. Simon & Schuster, 2001. What Dads Can’t Do. Simon & Schuster, 2000. Both written by Douglas Wood.


What Is a Good Young Picture Book? Here’s what it’s NOT: boring, maudlin, preachy, flat, confusing, or long-winded. What it IS: brief, original, fresh, often funny, satisfying, and possessed of something substantial at the center–call it a kernel of significance that makes it worth a child’s time. Humor can provide it, so can language, or character, or story. Like the child it’s written for, this picture book can be cozy and quiet or it can sing and swing, but always it loves language. It’s told in words that bear repeating–even a grown-up can savor them again and again. It’s grounded in a child’s own world, the real world or the play world of a young child’s imagination. It’s simple and simply irresistible. And it’s a hair-puller to write.

Alice Schertle. All You Need For a Beach. Ill. by Barbara Lavallee. Harcourt, 2004. 1, 2, I Love You. Ill. by Emily Arnold McCully. Chronicle, 2004.


It’s hard to put it in terms that make sense, but where a picture book differs from the other genres is that its universe has an underlying exuberance that defies containment. Everything is bigger in a picture book–the emotions, the colors, the drama, the intensity. While having the illusion of control, just by their physical brevity, the best picture books actually border on being “out of control.” Who can not turn the page of a good picture book? Once you open the book, there’s no controlling the turn of pages–you have to do it. A perfect example is the work of Denise Fleming–her books spill out of the covers, so that it feels like the action extends beyond the edges of the paper and boards. I love this about picture books–the feeling of vibrancy even in so called “quiet” books. They hum, these books do, even when they are closed.

Kathi Appelt. Incredible Me. Ill. by G. Brian Karas. HarperCollins, 2003. Bubba and Beau, Best Friends. Ill. by Arthur Howard. Harcourt, 2002.


Q: What makes a good young picture book?
A:Humor.

 

Tedd Arnold. Huggly (The Monster Under the Bed) series. Scholastic, 1997-2004. Parts. Dial, 1997.


There must be dozens of elements that make a very young picture book sing to very young readers. But if I had to isolate just one key ingredient, I’d go with whimsy. A book that draws from its admirers a measurable giggle is a success by any benchmark. So I hope my young reader picture books will always incorporate a little silly.

Kelly Milner Halls. I Bought a Baby Chicken. Ill. by Karen Stormer Brooks. Boyds Mills, 2000.


Cooking up a good young picture book requires several ingredients:

1. Start with something familiar, such as a situation, problem, or feeling that’s universal.
2. Add interesting, unique characters.
3. Combine that with a plot surprise or a twist.
4. Add a dash of humor or rhyme, suit to taste.
5. Sift out anything that doesn’t ring true.
6. Stir until the consistency is just right.

Joan Holub. Somebunny Loves Me. Simon & Schuster, 2003. Eek-a-Boo: A Spooky Lift- the-Flap Book. Scholastic, 2000.


“What make a good young picture book?” Maurice Sendak once said that, with very little people, you need to tempt them into turning the pages to see what’s next, rather than trying to eat the book like a cookie. He was speaking primarily about his drawings, but I think the same holds true for the words. So . . . language that is vital and seductive. Contagious language—words so delicious a young child will wish to taste them, possibly repeat or chant them. A story that originates in the author’s heart, rather than head, since young children are nearly all feeling. And, of course, a wonderful story (in the true meaning of wonderful). A story that stimulates and simulates the fabulous imagination of young children. A “me, me, me!” story–one in which there is barely a boundary between the child who is being read the story and the child or child substitute in the story. In other words, a story into which a young child can easily step in his or her imagination.

As for pictures, they should complete, enhance, and illuminate the meaning of the words. When all is right in a young picture book, the text and the drawings dance together in a kind of waltz or “pas de deux.” Young picture books are important–far more important than they are credited for being. They are, after all, the first books a human being experiences in what, it is hoped, will be a lifetime of reading. So, young picture books have a big job—they must charm and entice a child into hunger for “more, more, more” good books!

Roni Schotter. Captain Bob Takes Flight. Atheneum, 2003. Captain Bob Sets Sail. Atheneum, 2000. Both ill. by Jon Cepeda. Room for Rabbit. Clarion, 2003. Missing Rabbit. Clarion, 2002. Both ill. by Cyd Moore.


Good young picture books appeal to children and adults alike. They usually have bold, brightly-colored artwork, simple language with strong read-aloud rhythm, and overall packages that parents consider a good value in terms of both content and price. Concept-driven books with spare text and clear lessons are just right for preschoolers, who are tackling basic but
important concepts like the association of words to objects, the identification of colors, the concept of counting (1-10). Enhancements like touchable elements, noise-makers, etc., add to reading-time fun, as in Matthew Van Fleet’s exuberant board book Tails, a current New York Times Book Review bestseller.

But by far, I think the most important element of a good young picture book, whether it has an overt lesson or a more subtly-handled message, is that it offer a story or theme that bring parents and young children together. Who wouldn’t enjoy cozying up for a lovely bedtime tale or a fun read-aloud frolic? A great picture book will bring the generations together every time.

Deborah Halverson. Editor, Harcourt.


Picture books must appeal not only to the child, but also to the adult who reads them aloud, or simply hands them joyfully over to the child. It is this combination–the sharing of a loved book–that will have the most impact. When I imagine picture books, I think of the child responding to my delight in the reading, anticipating the turn of each page. In some books, we oooooh and ahhhh over the pictures; in others, it’s the rhythm that has our attention.

Babies like contrasts—shapes, bold colors or black and white. They enjoy photographs…and the rhythm of the voice who shares them. Milne knew abut rhythm for babies. When We Were Very Young, where Jonathan Jo with his mouth like an O and James James Morrison Morrison Weatherby George Dupree reside, are perfect. Goodnight Moon, the standout baby picture book classic, never fails. The art and repetitive rhythm work in perfect harmony, and the book is read again and again to the youngest set.

As children get older, add more busy-ness to their books. Toddlers like to point out items on a page. That’s why Richard Scarry is a classic. Read them stories with repetition or rhyme so they can chime in. Karen Beaumont’s Baby Danced the Polka has toddlers shouting animal names with each new page.

Nothing beats a good tale as children get older. Bob, by Tracey Campbell Pearson and Don’t Fidget a Feather by Erica Silverman are picture books I can count on for success whether I’m reading to one child or to a crowd. They happen to be humorous stories–in pictures and in words–but the important thing is that the text can hold the attention. In my years as a bookseller I’ve seen that appealing illustrations will cause one to pick up a book in the first place, but engaging text is required for it to be chosen year after year.

I don’t believe there is a recipe for a good picture book. The partnership between text and art –each supporting the other–is essential. Children are not fooled by ‘cute’ without a good tale. There is simply no way to get around rich text with illustrations to match.

Valerie Lewis. Co-owner, Hicklebee’s Bookstore. Valerie and Walter’s Best Books for Children: A Lively, Opinionated Guide, 2nd Edition (with Walter Mayes). HarperResource, 2004.


I don’t think there’s one single thing that makes a picture book work for young children. The same could be said of books for any age, including adults. Obviously, with a picture book the art is terribly important and the story should be something that children can relate to. There’s a place in the world for silly books with no message at all, as well as for books which touch on life lessons, environmental issues, or socialization skills. Kids come in all flavors, so it’s important to have books in all flavors too.

Sarah Weeks. If I Were a Lion. Ill by Heather M. Solomon. Atheneum, 2004. My Somebody Special. Ill. by Ashley Wolff. Gulliver Books, 2002. Mrs. McNosh Hangs Up Her Wash. Ill. by Nadine Bernard Westcott. HarperCollins, 1998.


Perhaps I can speak best not as an illustrator of children’s books, but as the child I once was because in that childhood I have very clear personal memories of the books I looked at and whether or notthey invited me more deeply into them through their stories and illustrations. I am fifty–three years old now and grew up in South Africa, so my memories are colored by what books came my way then and there.

I remember being afraid to open the pages of Beatrix Potter books and unable to absorb the charming animal drawings because to see them I had first to look through what I remember as opaque and depressing landscapes. As an adult I searched through her books looking for these landscapes and never found them, yet I know they were there! I remember a small fat pig in a tight jacket running desperately across a somber olive green field, seeming to be nowhere near his home. The panic and claustrophobia I felt almost made me nauseated. This memory serves when I paint and illustrate in that I prefer a light feeling on the page. Life is always in transition, and we should sort of float through the story quite safely, rather than getting bogged down in it.

In juxtaposition, with very simple lines and no color, Ernest Shepherd’s illustrations for the Christopher Robin and Winnie the Pooh books created just that kind of atmosphere. In my imagination I still stand at the edge of that conifer and oak forest, so simply evoked, and hear the wind’s laconic murmur through the branches.

I remember the windy day when Piglet grew very afraid but tried to hide his anxiety, and an open field where someone stole little Roo from Kanga. I may have been anxious but I was also very amused and felt quite safe for all of us. Then there was the turbulent river in which little Roo nearly drowned, but thought he was swimming while everyone tried to save him. I felt always reassured that honey and bread and tea and a warm parlor MUST be nearby.

These characters with all their foibles and fearfulness, silly mock bravado or ability to fool their own selves were perhaps as vulnerable as I was, and thus true friends. Nor were they running away from or toward anything that ominous, and THAT was comforting!

One of the reasons I feel sad about Winnie the Pooh becoming animated and colored, even when drawn well, is what is lost for a child. The wise simplicity of word and line on quiet pages reflects only what is already true for the child who is never too far from home. Leaning up against the reader or snuggled in a blanket listening, he or she has also played Pooh-sticks in that stream.

Elivia Savadier. A Bedtime Story. Written by Mem Fox. Mondo, 1996. The Mysterious Visitor: Stories of the Prophet Elijah. Scholastic, 1997. The Uninvited Guest and Other Jewish Holiday Tales. Scholastic, 1995. Both written by Nina Jaffe.


 

 

Knock Poetry Off the Pedestal: It’s time to make poems a part of children’s everyday lives

Published in School Library Journal,  April 2010

It was last October, and I was feeling self-congratulatory. I had already booked the 11 participants for the next “Poetry Blast,” the reading by children’s poets at the American Library Association’s annual conference. Once again, we were going to spread the good word that poetry is an aural art.

Then I got an email from Richie Partington, friend, critic, and kids’ lit missionary. He’d been invited to teach a class on children’s and young adult poetry at San Jose State University’s School of Library and Information Science. “What important concepts about poetry would you like library school students to learn about?” he asked.

“Well, Richie,” I started to reply, “as I’ve always said, to appreciate poetry, you have to hear it.” But then all of my assurance went out the window. Surely, I thought, that isn’t the only concept that future school librarians need to embrace. I know firsthand that most kids seem to like poetry. But something amiss happens along the road to adulthood, and many of those same students end up actively disliking poetry or not relating to it. And who can blame them? Poetry is often presented as a rarefied thing that exists only to be analyzed by professorial types or as greeting-card sentiments to be enjoyed by love-struck girls (and the guys who hit on them). So, I mulled, what can librarians do to buck this trend? I know! I’ll ask some other poets who write for young readers.

One of the first to respond was poet-photographer Charles R. Smith, Jr., whose latest book, My People (S & S/Atheneum), nabbed the 2010 Coretta Scott King Illustrator Award, thanks to his stunning photos. He immediately came up with a grand mantra: “Poetry needs to be taken off the pedestal.” He adds, “While poetry month is a good idea in theory, it ultimately confines poetry to that one month. As a black poet, I’m busy in February [Black History Month] and April [National Poetry Month], but I’m still a black poet the other 10 months of the year!” The solution? “By exposing students to poetry on a daily basis, by connecting it with their everyday lives, they begin to see the beauty and value in words,” says Smith.

Yes! I agree. And so does Julie Larios. Perhaps “librarians don’t use more poetry because they’re afraid of it,” and some believe it’s “nowhere near as sturdy as fiction or nonfiction… or it’s too cute, maybe, for kids,” says Larios, winner of the 2006 Pushcart Prize for poetry and a teacher in Vermont College’s Writing for Children program. “That’s why poetry comes out for only one month of the year and at holidays. I would love to have librarians stop thinking poetry should only be about snowmen, hearts, dancing flowers, bunnies, ice cream, witches, pumpkins, turkeys, jingle bells, and the wind.”

The beautiful thing about poems is that they can be enjoyed on many levels, and they can create so many connections. Not only are there poems that tie into any subject—from science to social studies—but there are all types of poems for all types of people. “The most important concept I’d love to see librarians and media specialists embrace is that poetry is available for everyone—from the rainbow-unicorn-loving kids to the goth kids,” says Laura Purdie Salas, the author of Stampede! Poems to Celebrate the Wild Side of School (Clarion, 2009). “Library holdings that reflect a wide array of styles and moods are so great for young readers. Let them read silly and serious, escapist and thought-provoking, rural and urban poetry. Show them passionate and sarcastic poems. If we can share enough kinds of poems with children, I think all kids can find themselves somewhere in them.”

What’s the best way to present poetry? Monica Gunning, a former elementary school teacher, remembers what her famed poetry instructor, Myra Cohn Livingston, used to say: “Poetry invites children to participate in the delights of bounding rhythm, to clap their hands, to tap their feet, move their bodies if they wish to do so.” And Joan Bransfield Graham, whose concrete poems take on the shape of what they’re describing, endorses a similar strategy. “Begin with the pleasures and joy of poetry—luxuriate in it—the rhythms, rhymes, luscious language and playfulness,” she says. “I love to do poems in an interactive call-and-response way so that children can be part of the poem.”

Kristine O’Connell George thinks that Charlotte Huck, the late children’s literature expert, would have approved of these kid-friendly approaches. “Huck recommended reading poems at least twice—not only to allow a child time to revel in the language but also to create an opportunity for the child and the poem to connect,” says George, who served as poetry consultant for Storytime, a PBS series aimed at turning young kids into lifelong readers. “Charlotte saw children as active participants in the poetry experience and honored their ability to have a personal encounter with a poem without adult interference.”

What other strategies work with young readers? Joyce Sidman, a two-time Cybil Award winner, offers some road-tested advice. “I try to avoid the phrase ‘What does the poet mean when she says?’ I think we need to start with asking questions about a poem: What pictures does this poem paint in your head? What words do you like? What don’t you understand? What surprises you? How does this poem make you feel?”

Another surefire way to connect kids to poetry is to ask them to tuck a favorite poem inside a library book. That way, when their classmates pick up a novel or nonfiction book, they’ll also have a poem on hand, says Lee Bennett Hopkins, winner of the National Council for Teachers of English 2009 Award for Excellence in Poetry for Children. “Librarians can encourage readers to add another poem,” he explains. “Within months one novel might have three, four, or more verses relating to the plot, characters, or setting inside its covers for future readers to enjoy.” As an alternative to leaving a poem, kids can keep the ones they find. After all, who doesn’t love a freebie—especially one that has just “turned up” in a book, perhaps with the title “Take This Poem.”

Hopkins’s anthologies, which feature the works of diverse groups of poets writing in a variety of forms on a range of subjects and themes, also help students connect with poetry, as do those compiled by Jack Prelutsky, Bobbi Katz, Betsy Franco, Mary Ann Hoberman and Linda Winston, and many others. So much wealth is contained in anthologies such as Hopkins’s Sharing the Seasons (S & S, 2010), Prelutsky’s The Beauty of the Beast (Knopf, 1997), Katz’s Pocket Poems (Dutton, 2004), Franco’s You Hear Me? (Candlewick, 2001), and Hoberman and Winston’s The Tree That Time Built (Sourcebooks, 2009)! And, as Susan Marie Swanson, whose The House in the Night (Houghton), illustrated by Beth Krommes, snagged the 2009 Caldecott Medal, points out, anthologies don’t demand to be read from cover to cover. There’s a freedom in knowing that you can start in the middle of a collection or skip around.

Anthologies also provide a great service by introducing young readers and librarians to the many talented poets who aren’t household names. After all, with all due respect to the creator of The Giving Tree, “there is life after Shel Silverstein!” says poet and literacy specialist Tracie Vaughn Zimmer. “While kids do love humorous verse, it’s also important to show them why adults turn to poetry whenever the world weighs heavy on their shoulders, how words become a refuge. We do children a disservice when we only show them poetry that is funny and rhymed.”

To help kids discover new poets, Juanita Havill, the editor of Book Love (Phoenix College, 2000), suggests grouping individual collections alongside anthologies. J. Patrick Lewis, who has written poems about everything from Blackbeard to an underwear salesman, and Swanson, who works with kids in the Twin Cities’ schools, are big fans of creating a “poetry corner,” where rotating groups of books are constantly on display.

And how about making poetry trading cards? It’s another way to fall in love with poems and the poets who write them. Plus, it’s easy to do. Start by asking your students to find a poem they like in an anthology. Then have them find a book written by the same poet and pick out another poem that appeals to them. Next, kids can copy their poems on blank cards and illustrate these with their own drawings or pictures from old magazines. Finally, it’s time to trade. If students don’t like the poems they receive, they can keep trading for another one.

Trading poems is one way to fall in love with poetry and the poets who write it. Another method is former lawyer–turned–children’s writer Janet Wong’s “poetry suitcase.” Kids get roughly 15 minutes to look through poetry books, select poems, and write them on index cards. Then students take their poems home. A week later, they bring back their cards, each tied to a prop. For example, a poem about the wind might be attached to a broken umbrella, or one about a birthday party might go with a balloon. Then the props and poems go into a suitcase. When there’s a spare minute, the librarian lets a student choose a poem from the suitcase and read it aloud.

David Harrison, who has the distinction of having had an elementary school, in Springfield, MO, named after him, knows of a teacher who hosts “Fishbowl Fridays.” Her students drop their favorite poems into a fishbowl, and at the end of the week, she draws out a few for her kids to read aloud. With permission from colleagues, the teacher then brings the kids to other classrooms to read the poems aloud.

All of these activities show that poems are something to enjoy. As Naomi Shihab Nye, who’s new book, Time You Let Me In: 25 Poets Under 25 (Greenwillow, 2010), features the creations of some exciting young talents, says, “Poetry is fun… sometimes people just need to be reminded.” And, she adds, “it’s even ‘fun’ to express painful things with clarity, sometimes. More fun than not speaking.”

Taking an even broader view of what librarians can do to spread the gospel of poetry, Larios sees both libraries and poems as “community builders” and suggests that poetry and prose can be presented in conjunction with a wide range of hot topics and events—everything from a discussion of climate change to the opening day of the baseball season. “Can you imagine what the local media would do if they heard that a branch library, on the occasion of a global conference on climate change, had organized a reading of nature poetry and passages from Walden—and that the readers included kids?” asks Larios. “Wouldn’t that be wonderful?”

So, that brings us back to my own mantra: poetry demands to be heard. In fact, “kids have more trouble reading a poem than hearing it,” explains Jane Yolen, whom Newsweek magazine dubbed America’s Hans Christian Andersen. “So read these things aloud. First you, then a single child, then the entire class—then you again. Heard that often, the poem will have wormed its way into the child’s ear.” What a marvelous way to take poetry off that pedestal and make it live among us—warm and welcome.

 

Poetry Is a Blast

But don’t just take my word for it. Here are some additional ideas from my fellow poets…

Betsy Franco (www.betsyfranco.com)

“I purposely wrote a collection of school poems for two voices, Messing Around on the Monkey Bars, to encourage children to read poetry out loud.”

Kristine O’Connell George (www.kristinegeorge.com)

“Read my book Toasting Marshmallows by flashlight with the lights off or by a faux bonfire made of twigs and red cellophane.”

Joan Bransfield Graham (joangraham.com)

“My ‘Popsicle’ poem from Splish Splash is fun to do in “call and response.” On my Web site, I provide schools with a master for “Popsicle” bookmarks so they can run them off in their favorite flavors.”

Monica Gunning

“Many poems in my books are good for dramatizing. For example, I have children take off and carry their shoes during “Walking to Church” from Not a Copper Penny in Me House.”

David Harrison (davidlharrison.wordpress.com)

“I share poems from my autobiographical collection, Connecting Dots. Then we start lists of what the students remember of their past experiences, and they write their own memory poems.”

Juanita Havill

“I have kids dramatize the scarecrow poem, ‘The Monster,’ from my book I Heard It from Alice Zucchini. I bring in a costume and invite someone to play the scarecrow. Others students get to be the various vegetables and birds that appear in the poem.”

Lee Bennett Hopkins

“I use ‘Let’s Talk’ by Rebecca Kai Dotlich from my collection Wonderful Wordswith children of all ages. The verse opens up so much discussion with readers about things they want to talk about.”

Bobbi Katz (www.bobbikatz.com)

“In my book More Pocket Poems, the opening piece speaks of what can only fit in a pocket when tucked in a poem. I suggest kids go on a treasure hunt for poems about animals, objects, emotions, etc., that those poems make portable.”

Julie Larios (julielarios.blogspot.com)

“My book Imaginary Menagerie is filled with questions. We explore them, and then I have kids write poems that must include at least two questions.”

J. Patrick Lewis (www.jpatricklewis.com)

“I recite riddle verse from my books such as Spot the Plot or Scien-trickery. Kids get to be a part of the action when they can shout out their guesses.”

Naomi Shihab Nye (www.barclayagency.com/speakers/naomi-shihab-nye)

“I suggest using The Way It Is, by William Stafford, to get kids’ brains on their ‘poetry channel’ and also Salting the Ocean: 100 Poems by Young Poets, which I edited.”

Laura Purdie Salas (www.laurasalas.com)

“With my book Stampede! I find that kids love to do different voices, bark and oink, call out the rhyming words, and do hand motions.”

Joyce Sidman (www.joycesidman.com)

“For a discussion starter, pair the poem “This Is Just to Say” by William Carlos Williams with my book This Is Just to Say: Poems of Apology and Forgiveness. As an added activity, have participants try their hand at an apology poem.”

Marilyn Singer (marilynsinger.net)

“Have kids do paired readings of the reversos from my book Mirror Mirror,acting out the fairy tale characters.”

Charles R. Smith, Jr. (www.charlesrsmithjr.com)

“I perform Langston Hughes’s My People, a book with photos by me. Teachers and librarians can use it with kids to get them to describe themselves or friends and family.”

Susan Marie Swanson (www.susanmarieswanson.com)

“I encourage discussion by showing connections. For example, I pair my picture book To Be Like the Sun, which is addressed to a sunflower, with ‘Sandia,’ a poem addressed to a watermelon, from Gary Soto’s Canto Familiar.

Janet Wong (www.janetwong.com)

“Start your ‘poetry suitcase’ with a dog toy and a selection such as ‘Dog’ from my book Twist or poems from Douglas Florian’s Bow Wow Meow Meowand Kristine O’Connell George’s Little Dog Poems.”

Jane Yolen (janeyolen.com)

“I tell kids to pick a poem to set to music and record it for the class. For example, several of my poems in Dinosaur Dances have been recorded by Lui Collins.”

Tracie Vaughn Zimmer (tracievaughnzimmer.com/TVZ/HOME.html)

“Have students try writing an ode to poetry like my poem ‘The Poems I Like Best’ from 42 Miles.”

For more ideas check out Hopkins’s Pass the Poetry, Please (HarperCollins, 1998) and Sylvia Vardell’s Poetry Aloud Here! (ALA Editions, 2006).

Ten Tips For Writing Poetry

1.  Pay attention to the world around you—little things, big things, people, animals, buildings, events, etc. What do you see, hear, taste, smell, feel?

2.  Listen to words and sentences. What kind of music do they have? How is the music of poetry different from the music of songs?

3.  Read all kinds of poetry. Which poems do you like and why?

4.  Read what you write out loud. How does it sound? How could it sound better?

5.  Ask yourself: does this poem have to rhyme? Would it be good or better if it didn’t? If it should rhyme, what kind of rhyme would be best? (For example, 1st and 2nd lines rhyme; 3rd and 4th lines rhyme—“Roses are red/So is your head/Violets are blue/So is your shoe”; or 1st and 3rd lines rhyme; 2nd and 4th lines rhyme—“What is your name?/Who is your mother?/This poem is quite lame/I should try another.”

6.  Ask yourself: does this poem sound phoney? Don’t stick in big words or extra words just because you think a poem ought to have them.

7. A title is part of a poem. It can tell you what the poem is about. It can even be another line of the poem.

8.  Before you write, think about what you want your whole poem to say.

9.  If you end up saying something else, that’s okay, too. Poet X.J. Kennedy says, “You intend to write a poem about dogs, say, and poodle is the first word you’re going to find a rhyme for. You might want to talk about police dogs, Saint Bernards, and terriers, but your need for a rhyme will lead you to noodle and strudel. The darned poem will make you forget about dogs and write about food instead.”

10.  Go wild. Be funny. Be serious. Be whatever you want! Use your imagination, your own way of seeing.

 

Poetry Goes Full Blast

Published in School Library Journal, October 2005

It began where lots of good ideas do—in the library. To be specific, in the cafeteria of the Brooklyn Public Library’s Central Branch. I was having lunch with Barbara Genco, Director of Collection Development, former president of the Association of Library Service to Children (ALSC), and an old friend. We were discussing one of our favorite topics—how to give poetry more press. I’d coorganized and participated in a panel about poetry at a previous American Library Association conference, and I wanted more. So did Barbara.

“Poetry needs to be heard,” one of us said. The other one of us nodded. And who better to read it than the poets who wrote it, we agreed. Excited by the prospect, we wrote out a wish list of poets and an outline for the event—there would be 15 poets whom Barbara and I would alternately introduce and each would read for seven minutes. We named it the First Annual ALSC Poetry Blast, to be held in Orlando, FL. A bit cocky, those words “first annual,” but we hoped to establish a tradition. Then we submitted a proposal to ALSC detailing the program. We were thrilled when it was accepted. Easy, right? Well, not exactly…

We needed to learn a few things about the proper way to birth a Blast—how to work with the publishers’ marketing departments to sponsor poets (it is essential to approach the publishers first; it is embarrassing to get a yes first from an author—and a no from the sponsor); how to request books and publicity material from said publishers; how to program the event so that it is diverse and balanced; how to promote it (we’re still working on that); how to make sure it’s the right length (we’re still working on that, too; we’ve had to cut down on the number of poets and install a timer); how to ask for a room that’s the right size and location (which we can’t always get); and how to enlist help in preparing the space, supplying the equipment, and displaying handouts, etc. Obviously, we’re continuing to learn the best methods for hosting this event, but the good news is that the Poetry Blast (PB) is on its way to becoming a tradition. We just got an acceptance from ALSC for PB3 in 2006.

But perhaps even more exciting is that the Blast is being cloned! Angus Killick, School and Library Marketing Director of Hyperion, asked me to cohost a Blast at the May 2005 International Reading Association convention. At the April 2005 Texas Library Association conference, Sylvia Vardell, a professor at Texas Woman’s University’s School of Library and Information Studies, organized a Poetry Round-Up featuring 10 poets. A big success, it drew 250 people and she will host another next year. In addition, Sylvia has helped host the Texas Poetry Festival in the Dallas area for the past three years. This has been a collaboration of Texas Woman’s University, Irving Independent School District, and the Irving Public Library—with other school districts getting involved over time. The all-day event includes a keynote by the featured poet in the morning and workshops for teachers and librarians, then a talk by the poet, slams and jams (hosted by local poets), and creative activities in the afternoon for families, kids, and the public at large.

In Park Slope, Brooklyn—my neighborhood—PS 321 has long had a program entitled “Meet the Writers,” which brings two authors to the school for each grade every year. They also have “Free Fridays”—culturally enriching or ethnically diverse programming, paid for from grant money or PTA funds. Parents are heavily involved in making these programs work—they write grants, do publicity, order books, decorate the gym, supply refreshments, etc. Last fall, Scottie Bowditch, a PS 321 parent who works for Hyperion Books for Children, suggested that they hold a Poetry Blast. When the principal and committee agreed, she asked me to host it. Anne Capeci, fellow author and the parent who coordinates “Meet the Writers,” volunteered to manage the food, decorations, equipment, etc. My job was to get the poets, program the presentation, and be the emcee. Again, I worked with the publishers to find authors and get their books, and I wrote introductions for each one. And, of course, I got to read my own work as well.

This well-attended event was also a success. It thrilled me that a local school had agreed to promote spoken poetry. And it made me wonder what other schools can do to host their own poetry events—events that feature the work of published poets. Why published poets? Because, to be blunt, I think it’s important to share the best stuff with children and their families. I know there are good unpublished poets out there, but you run the risk of a mediocre program when you book folks whose work you don’t know.

How do you get published poets to appear at your school? You generally work with the publishers’ school and marketing departments. You can request particular authors or allow the publishers to suggest them. In addition, there are other folks who book authors’ visits. Catherine Balkin, formerly of HarperCollins, runs Balkin Buddies (www.balkinbuddies.com) and Sharron L. McElmeel is the director of McBookWords (www.mcbookwords.com). Both book authors in schools, libraries, and conferences. If you are in a major metropolitan area, you will generally have access to more authors. If not, you may only be able to get one featured poet. Even having just one poet requires funding. You will need to investigate grants, bake or book sales, community donations, etc.

Is it possible to have a Poetry Blast with one published author? No. But it is possible to have other readers read the works of other published authors. Mary Napoli, Assistant Professor of Education at Penn State, suggests that universities can be a great resource:
“Poetry Blasts don’t necessarily have to cost a school district an inordinate amount of money. If schools want to conduct a Blast, but don’t have the funding to support a school visit, they could still enlist the assistance of university students to serve as ‘poetry minstrels.’ University faculty within schools of education/literature want to find ways to support collaborative projects, so asking students to facilitate the Blast might be a way to ‘foster’ the idea among future educators and to celebrate poetry.”

There are also professional groups such as Poetry Alive! (www.poetryalive.com) and Poetry in Motion, affiliated with the “Young Audiences” art program (www.yanorthtexas.org), which perform in schools, libraries, and other venues for a reasonable fee. Sharron McElmeel wrote to tell me what happened when Poetry Alive! appeared at an elementary school:

“Prior to their scheduled visit, we asked the group to supply a list of the poems they would use in their dramatic presentations….We used that list to become totally familiar with those poems and others that connected in some way. Our students practiced their own dramatic readings. Some created a choral reading; some a 3- or 4-part rendition….The day of the visit of Poetry Alive!—what a wonderful group—the leader invited the children to join in. And join in they did. A marvelous day!”

Sharron points out the importance of familiarity with the poets’ work. Although there is certainly pleasure in hearing new poems, I suspect that there is even more pleasure when students know the poems and can virtually recite them along with the reader. It is also wise for the hosts to know an author’s work. I can write better introductions when I’ve read a writer’s books and I can make suggestions and answer questions from the presenters as to what they should read and in what order.

Let me here make a point about order. Whether your event is large or small, it still needs to be programmed. For the first Poetry Blast, our “cast” performed in alphabetical order. Poor Jane Yolen may never forgive me! Amazingly enough, the arrangement worked in terms of balancing light verse with more serious poetry, different voices and forms, etc. But we decided not to trust to luck and the alphabet for PB2. We put the 12 poets in the order that we felt worked best. Even if your readers are not the authors themselves, you still need to find a sequence that works best for what they are planning to read.

Regarding readers who aren’t authors: PS 282, another school in my neighborhood, asks local politicians, school officials, parents, and teachers to participate at a Read-In. The same folks can be asked to do a Poetry Blast. Or the school library can set out a selection of poetry books and have students pick a favorite poem from each to read aloud. At schools, this can be done within each class or it can become a school-wide event. Students can even audition to read, much like for a play.

And all of the arts can combine for such a Blast. For their event, PS 321 had a dance teacher choreograph a dance to a Langston Hughes poem. At Eastplain Elementary School on Long Island, my alma mater, a music teacher set one of my poems to music. The kids sang it to me and I nearly cried with delight. Art teachers often have students illustrate poems and use these illustrations to decorate the gym, auditorium, or lunchroom. The teachers and librarian at Sharron McElmeel’s school helped students develop choral readings, duets, etc. In many schools, in addition to presenting published work, there are also open mike events and contests where students and adults can read their own work.

All of these events and techniques allow students, families, and professionals to appreciate the auditory nature of poetry—and the connection it has to many other arts. It is my feeling that when we hear poetry, we enjoy it more. When we enjoy it more, we spread that enthusiasm to others—our peers, our colleagues, our students, our children. How delightful the world would be if along with “How are you?” each of us asked, “Heard any good poetry today?” and the answer came back, “Yes! Wanna hear it?”

A Blast of Poetry

Published in School Library Journal, September 2004

Some kids like to play baseball. Some prefer playing “house.” And more than a few enjoy both. I was a kid who liked to play with words. I was fascinated not only by their sounds and their definitions, but by their shades of meaning. I would take my paper dolls and concoct elaborate descriptions of their costumes: “This stunning magenta sheath is made of watered silk with a tulle peplum. The matching cloche hat has hand-sewn paillettes.” What a joy it was to be able to distinguish magenta from rose, paillettes from mere sequins.

I was enchanted by words then—and I still am. And what better to do with such enchantment than to bring the magic to others, children in particular, by becoming a writer—and, more specifically, a poet? For what genre is as much about gorgeous, glorious, perfect words than poetry?

Samuel Coleridge said it well: “Prose is words in their best order; Poetry is the best words in their best order.” I’ve used this quote many times in speeches and articles, and I still believe it. It’s not that prose doesn’t also call for exactitude and shading, but that poetry requires it. In a poem, every word counts. However, since there’s a lot of poetry out there (as well as prose that purports to be poetry), I’ve recently amended the quote in my mind to read “the best poetry is the best words in their best order.” For some time now, I’ve been asking myself and other poets what constitutes the best poetry. I could add “for children,” but in my opinion good poetry is good poetry, whomever the audience. When Michael Cart and I convened a poetry panel at the 2002 ALA Convention in Atlanta, I put together a selection of poets’ answers to the question “What Makes a Good Poem?” These responses, some of which I will quote throughout this piece, showed both diversity and commonality. With regard to the latter, everyone agreed on the ability of a good poem to say a lot in a few perfectly chosen words.

Good poets are fussy, always looking for that right word, always arranging and rearranging the order of the words until they sing. Sometimes the words are unusual or sophisticated, as in Lillian Morrison’s “Green Song” (Whistling the Morning In, Boyds Mills, 1992) where she talks of “glory-filled weather… when grasshoppers in their gauntlets/hop along high.” Other times they are simple, as in Valerie Worth’s “Sparrow” (All the Small Poems and Fourteen More, Farrar, 1994), which begins “Nothing is less/Rare than/One dust-/Colored sparrow/In a driveway.” If Worth had said “Nothing is more common than…,” the poem itself would have been more mundane. If Morrison had used gloves instead of gauntlets, she would not have conveyed the prickly, armored look of grasshopper legs. The best words in their best order indeed.

But much as I agree with Coleridge, I feel he tells only part of the tale. The best poems may be funny, profound, or both. They may ask philosophical questions of various weight. They may use established forms or create their own. But whatever form they take—whether they amuse, provoke, move, or enlighten—the best poems do so not only through the exceptional use of language, but also through rhythm, rhyme, imagery, surprise, and, as Naomi Shihab Nye says, “a way of ending that leaves a new resonance or a lit spark in the reader or listener’s mind.”

An evocative poem can, like a photograph, capture a moment in time. It does so through unique images that touch and delight us because of both their freshness and their rightness. Sometimes, a single, vivid, detailed image is the poem. A great image, as Lee Bennett Hopkins points out, can really blow you away. But one blow-you-away image does not by itself make a wonderful poem. The rest of the poem has to be designed with care to support that image, so that it in turn can pull the whole poem together. Hopkins himself created such a potent image in one of his autobiographical poems from Been to Yesterdays: Poems of a Life (Boyds Mills, 1995). The young narrator and his family, unable to pay the rent, must quickly vacate their apartment. The boy looks around at all the cardboard boxes full of objects and memories resting “there/when you need them most/to move you on—/there—/when we must take/flight/in the middle/of a wrinkled,/corrugated night.” That final, somewhat oblique image, so full of haste and impermanence, grabs me every single time I read the poem and resonates long after I’ve closed the book.

The best poems are often full of such subtleties. Even the seemingly straightforward requires thought. For example, we have to slow down to think about Kristine O’Connell George’s “Poaching” (Old Elm Speaks: Tree Poems, Clarion, 1998): “The neighbor’s fruit tree/has come to visit, bringing/ripe plums for dessert”; or to get the full “ah” effect of Nikki Grimes’s “Chinese Painting,” (Tai Chi Morning, Cricket, 2004) in which a master practices the same stroke repeatedly to capture “the essence of magpie or mountain”: “A few strokes/and a bird is born/A few more/and it sings.” Good poems often call upon us to ponder and to unravel. Patrice Vecchione puts this brilliantly: “A fine poem needs mystery… it doesn’t say everything. If you were to compare a poem to a simple math equation, say 1+1=2, then a poem is butterfly+jagged scar=his warm breath on your neck. It’s another way of knowing that makes perfect sense.”

When you read a poem silently, you have to take time to savor the images and the mystery to enjoy this other “way of seeing.” Adults are sometimes bugged by this. Kids usually are not. They don’t need or expect everything to be literal. They like figuring out puzzles. They’re often more capable of listening, really listening, possibly because they still like being read to. And if any type of literature demands to be read aloud, it’s poetry, for one of its most important aspects is its musicality. A good poem can use rigid or changeable meter; it can employ rhyme and a specific structure or be free verse. But whatever it is, its rhythm is, in Karla Kuskin’s words, “the skeleton that holds a poem together.”

It’s the rhythm that drives the poem, that speeds up or slows down our collective heartbeat. It may be the soothing pace of Jane Yolen’s “Grandpa Bear’s Lullaby” (Dragon Night and Other Lullabies, Routledge, 1980): “The night is long/But fur is deep/You will be warm/In winter’s sleep…”; or the testifying chant of Walter Dean Myers’s “Macon R. Allen, 38, Deacon” (Here in Harlem, Holiday, 2004): “I love a shouting church!/Praises bounding off the ceiling/The rhythm catching up the feet/Tambourines that send the spirits reeling/Yes, give me a shouting church!…”; or the mantra in my own “Spider” (Fireflies at Midnight, Atheneum, 2003): “Web/is the work/is the home/is the trap/is the hub/is the map….”

When rhythm goes askew, it’s often because of its partner in crime: rhyme. Rhyme is tough to write well. We’ve all read verse gone bad thanks to twisted syntax, mis-stressed and mispronounced words, tacked-on syllables or entire words, rhymes that aren’t, or moon/June/spoon clichés. But when rhyme works, the results make for marvelous poetry, appealing to both kids and adults. There is something viscerally, as well as mentally, satisfying about rhyme’s playful patterns, its musicality, its closure. It is interactive—we wait eagerly to see if we can come up with the correct rhyme, tickled if we’re clever enough to succeed, equally tickled if the poet has one-upped us with something so inspired we couldn’t possibly have imagined it. Good rhyme has genuine wit and style and, for kids, it’s usually funny. Consider “Consider Cow” by Alice Schertle (How Now, Brown Cow?, Harcourt,1994), which begins, “Consider cow/which rhymes with bough/but not with rough/that’s clear enough…”; or “The Mule” by Douglas Florian (Mammalabilia, Harcourt, 2000): “Voice of the mule: bray/Hue of the mule: bay/Fuel of the mule: hay/Rule of the mule: stay”; or “August Ice Cream Cone Poem” (Food Fight, edited by Michael J. Rosen, Harcourt, 1996) by Paul Janeczko: “Lick/Quick.”

I get a good laugh from these poems. In fact, good poetry of any sort is good for us all. When I recently spoke to a group of fourth graders, I was heartened when they told me they love poetry because it makes them calm or lively or thoughtful or happy. Joseph Bruchac says, “A good poem is like medicine. It can be made up of almost anything, but only when the ingredients are put together in the right proportions—neither too much nor too little—can it affect your life. Taking that medicine analogy even further, just a little dose of good poetry is sometimes all you need to be helped and even healed.” I know that Bruchac—and every fine poet out there—would agree that for that good medicine to work, we have to stop treating it as medicine. Poetry is not “hold your nose and swallow.” The best poems in the world can’t do their best work if folks think of them as cod liver oil.

One librarian told our poetry panel that she and her staff would rush into classrooms, read a poem or two, and run back out—a kind of commercial that broke up the kids’ day and made poems seem something worth buying. She has the right idea. At the 2004 ALA Convention in Orlando, former ALSC president Barbara Genco, of the Brooklyn Public Library, and I held the first Poetry Blast, at which 15 poets, myself included, read. The point of it was to present poetry as an aural art, to introduce the audience to really good poems by poets familiar and unfamiliar, and to have, well… a blast! It seems Barbara and I are on the right track because Poetry Blast 2 is scheduled for ALA Chicago, 2005, and there are proposals for this event at other major conferences. As J. Patrick Lewis says, “A good poem begs to be shared with others.” Thanks to all of us for sharing.

All of the quotations in this piece were used with permission from the publisher, the poet, or the poet’s representative.

Nurturing Wonder

Published in School Library Journal, January 2003

I can’t think of a novel of mine that was inspired by sheer irritation. Nonfiction is another story. When I heard one too many folks call a wasp a “bee,” a gorilla a “monkey,” and even a heron a “duck,” I got bugged enough to write A WASP IS NOT A BEE (Holt, 1995). Then there was the time at the Prospect Park Zoo when a little boy asked his mom why baboons have such big red butts. Despite a series of placards explaining the reason for these simian endowments, the mother loudly replied, “Because they’re sick.” Instead of howling at her, I came up with BOTTOMS UP!: A Book About Rear Ends (Holt, 1997).

What’s so important about taxonomic distinctions or the reproductive habits of animals? For that matter, why bother to study other creatures at all? The answer lies in how we view the world, in our ability to see ourselves as a part of the universe or as the center of it.

Scientists and naturalists have long told us that the living world is interconnected. No man is an island. Heck, no island is an island. What happens in one place may well affect a whole country, a continent, or the globe. The decimation of rain forests is an obvious and well-known example. Similarly, biologists, zoologists, and botanists speak of the importance of biodiversity. The loss of species may have widespread effects, some involving our own livelihood, well-being, even survival. Whether or not we know what those effects may be or what the “purpose” of a creature is, we do not have the moral or ethical right to cause its extinction—though in many cases we most certainly have the means.

We know all this, don’t we? We are concerned about it, right? The answer is yes—and no. I have long believed that we humans are generous, caring, and energetic, as well as selfish, greedy, and complacent—often all in a single day. We exhibit these traits in a wide variety of situations and toward a wide variety of subjects, but it seems to me that our contradictions are especially apparent with regard to the natural world. We love wild places, but crave oil, wood, meat, houses, shopping malls. We admire whales, elephants, wolves, eagles, but contribute to the destruction of their environment and their demise. We line up at zoos to see apes, sea lions, hippos, giraffes, but we ignore the warblers, butterflies, snakes, frogs in our own backyards.

How can we resolve our contradictions? We need to practice observation and self-assessment. We need to acquire knowledge, and that involves learning about beings other than ourselves and how we all fit together. To distinguish species, to know their names is to see that they are not interchangeable or replaceable. To study other creatures is to become fascinated with the beauty and complexity of the world and to be filled with a sense of wonder. Wonder is an antidote not only to cynicism, but also to complacency, narcissism, and greed. It helps put things in their proper perspective. It helps put us in our proper perspective. When we see ourselves as a small part of the whole, we become larger in intellect and in spirit.

How do we accomplish this? As a children’s book writer, I say start early—and start with books. All kinds of books. Jean Craighead George’s marvelous meldings of science and literature; Roland Smith’s ecological action novels; Joanne Ryder’s lyrical picture books; Jane Yolen’s rich, unsentimental poems about birds, Alice Schertle’s featuring cows, and Kristine O’Connell George’s on trees; and lots of informational nature books by the likes of Sneed Collard, Kathryn Lasky, Dorothy Hinshaw Patent, Laurence Pringle, Seymour Simon, and many others.

I want to stress poetry, my favorite thing to write, and informational books in particular to awaken and sustain a respect for nature. Good poetry is about seeing, really seeing (and hearing, smelling, tasting, touching), and doing so in unique ways. Good poetry uses the “ah” factor. Readers may not have viewed a robin, a waterfall, the fog in quite that way, but are surprised and delighted by the rightness of the poet’s images. This in turn encourages readers to look closely at the world around them and to notice what they haven’t noticed before.

Good poetry is also about specificity. William Carlos Williams said it best, in a famous poem, of course: “so much depends/upon/a red wheel/barrow/glazed with rain/water/beside the white/chickens.” A particular wheelbarrow, red, not blue; wet, not dry. A particular species—wasp, not bee; heron, not duck. Much depends on the details—maybe more than we can even know.

Details—of the factual kind—are abundantly found in informational books. They can be as enthralling as a poet’s images. True stories are as fascinating as invented ones. In “A Universe of Information: The Future of Nonfiction” (The Horn Book, November/December 2000), Betty Carter persuasively declares that good nonfiction books “have the power of bringing the real world, with all its wonder and history and imperfections and idiosyncratic inhabitants into a youngster’s consciousness. Even the very youngest children frequently find nonfiction as exciting as fictional stories.” But Carter goes on to say that children have repeatedly stated that “nonfiction reading isn’t considered real reading by many parents, teachers, and librarians. They confess they like particular books but can’t check them out because they have to get ‘something to read’ instead. That ‘something to read’ is invariably fiction.” If this is indeed true, it is a sad commentary on how nature and other nonfiction books are perceived, and it has far-reaching implications.

It seems to me that children who aren’t encouraged to read nature books are more likely to become adults who don’t read them either—and who also don’t buy them for their children. This is significant nowadays since publishers are most inclined to publish books that sell well to bookstores and not to institutional markets. Though there are many excellent nature books still being published, they tend to be geared to very young readers, with less text and more pictures. Nature books for middle-grade and teen readers are, in the words of Dorothy Hinshaw Patent, “becoming an endangered species.” If librarians, along with parents and teachers, are really relegating informational books to a lower status than fiction, the situation will only get worse. Fewer and/or less substantial nature books will be published and bought; fewer children—and adults—will learn about the wonder of nature through the joy of reading.

In these perilous times when more than half of the rain forests have been destroyed; 40 million acres of coral reefs have been killed; countless species are threatened; and our own government is engaged in deliberations over drilling in the Arctic Wildlife Preserve, mining in the Everglades, and burying nuclear waste in Yucca Mountain, NV, it is my firm belief that we need to publish and promote nature books more than ever. One organization that understands this idea is the Chicago Library System, which sponsors the innovative project NatureConnections.

This 15-year-old project brings nature to children through its huge collection of books and other materials; through programs that include visits with live animals, gardening, dinosaur study, and nature sketching; and through collaborative exhibits, events, and projects with zoos, botanic gardens, museums, and other educational institutions. Not only does NatureConnections give kids opportunities to read about and to observe nature, but it also helps professionals come up with creative concepts for using these books in the classroom—ideas ranging from building a walk-through rain forest to Batmania, which encourages kids to go batty over bats, to Enviro-Mania, an all-day celebration of young people’s efforts to protect the environment. As coordinator Elizabeth McChesney says, “We help children find the awe and appreciation of the real world around them.”

Into this pool of ideas, I’d like to toss a few of my own: nature trivia contests à la Jeopardy or Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?; Wacko Nature Fact of the Day, presented by librarians/teachers who dash into a classroom to surprise the students or by the students themselves; nature scavenger hunts; Come as Your Favorite Species Day; Come as the Most Misunderstood Species Day. The possibilities are endless and exciting.

At the American Library Association 2002 Annual Conference in Atlanta, we had a chance to share some of these possibilities at “Children’s Books and the Natural World,” a panel I conceived and moderated. The enthusiastic audience interacted with esteemed authors Jean Craighead George, Dorothy Hinshaw Patent, and Seymour Simon; Holiday House editor Mary Cash; and librarian Elizabeth McChesney. One eager attendee asked what we authors could do to promote our books in libraries. Turning the question around, we said, “What can you do to promote them?” It is this challenge that I pose to those reading this article. If met, it will bolster young readers’ sense of wonder about the natural world. It will help preserve this world. And it will insure that never again will I need to write a book out of sheer irritation.

David Harrison’s Blog

“I hope that everyone can take a few minutes to enjoy the remarks of my blog guest today, Marilyn Singer.  She has much to offer and has managed to be concise and helpful at the same time by first responding to six questions and then suggesting 10 tips for writing poetry.  She threw one of the questions back to me so I have a response in there too.  This is the kind of information you’ll want to refer back to from time to time. My thanks to Marilyn.  Without further ado, read on.”

Click here for the interview with David Harrison

Marilyn Singer, wiser in her books

“Marilyn Singer describes herself as a curious person—an accurate description when you consider the more than 50 children’s books she has written, including poetry, fairy tales, picture books, novels, mysteries, and nonfiction on a wide variety of topics.  ‘I like being called versatile,’ says Singer.  ‘I like that I write on lots of different things.'”

Click here for the interview with Patricia Newman